Ecône Consecrations

From IndependentWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

The Ecône Consecrations are those by which Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre consecrated four Catholic bishops on 30 June 1988, notwithstanding the express prohibition of the Pope.[1]

Contents

Announcement

The 81-year-old Lefebvre, who had founded in the 1970s the Society of Saint Pius X, in order to maintain a more traditional form of Catholicism distinct from the form he saw it as having taken after the Second Vatican Council, delivered a sermon at an ordination Mass in Ecône on 29 June 1987, in which he declared that "Rome is in darkness, in the darkness of error" and that "the bishops of the whole world are following the false ideas of the Council with their ecumenism and liberalism." He concluded: "This is why it is likely that before I give account of my life to the good Lord, I shall have to consecrate some bishops."[2]

Under Catholic canon law, the consecration of a bishop requires the permission of the Pope,[3] and violation of this norm since 1951 brings an automatic excommunication latae sententiae reserved to the Holy See, both for the bishop who consecrates another bishop and for the person who allows himself to be consecrated bishop.[4]

Consecrating a bishop without papal approval was strongly condemned by Pope Pius XII, who described the sacramental activity of bishops who had been consecrated without such approval as "gravely illicit, that is, criminal and sacrilegious." [5]

Discussions with Rome

Archbishop Lefebvre and the Holy See engaged in dialogue, and, on May 5 1988, Lefebvre and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) signed the text of an agreement intended to end the dispute and open the way for the consecration of a successor to Lefebvre.[6] In the first, doctrinal, part of the document, Lefebvre, in his own name and on behalf of the SSPX promised fidelity to the Catholic Church and to the Pope, accepted the doctrine contained in section 25 of the Second Vatican Council’s Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium on the Church’s magisterium, pledged a non-polemical attitude of communication with the Holy See on the problematic aspects of the Second Vatican Council, recognized the validity of the revised sacraments and promised to respect the common discipline of the Church and her law. The second, legal, part of the document envisaged, that, the SSPX would become a Society of Apostolic Life with certain exemptions,[7] it would have the faculty to celebrate the Tridentine rites, a special commission including two members of the SSPX to resolve conflicts and a member of the SSPX be consecrated as a bishop.

This document was to be submitted to the Pope for his approval. However, Archbishop Lefebvre quickly came to the view that he was being enticed into a trap. The very next day, he declared he was obliged in conscience to proceed, with or without papal approval, to ordain on 30 June a bishop to succeed him.[8]

A further meeting took place in Rome on 24 May. Archbishop Lefebvre was now promised that the Pope would appoint a bishop from among the members of the SSPX, chosen according to the normal procedures, and that the consecration would take place on 15 August, at the close of the Marian Year. In return, Lefebvre would have to request reconciliation with the Pope on the basis of the protocol of 5 May. Lefebvre requested in writing that the consecration of three bishops take place on 30 June and that the majority of the members of the special commission must be from the SSPX. On the Pope's instructions, Cardinal Ratzinger replied to Archbishop Lefebvre on 30 May, indicating that the Holy See found these requests unacceptable. Ratzinger further stated that, if Lefebvre persisted in his intention to carry out unauthorized consecrations on 30 June, the promised authorization for the consecration of a bishop would not be granted. [citation needed]

Consecration of four bishops

On 3 June, Lefebvre wrote from Ecône, stating that he intended to proceed with the consecrations. On 9 June, the Pope replied to him with a personal letter, appealing to him not to proceed with a design that "would be seen as nothing other than a schismatic act, the theological and canonical consequences of which are known to you". Lefebvre did not reply, and the letter was made public on 16 June.

On 17 June, Cardinal Bernardin Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops sent the proposed bishops a formal canonical warning that they would automatically incur the penalty of excommunication if they were ordained by Lefebvre without papal permission.

On 29 June Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger sent the following telegram to Archbishop Lefebvre:

For the love of Christ and his Church, the Holy Father asks you paternally and firmly to depart today for Rome, without proceeding on 30 June with the episcopal ordinations that you have announced. He prays the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul to inspire you not to be false to the episcopacy that has been placed in your charge and the oaths you have taken to remain faithful to the Pope, the successor of Peter. He begs God to keep you from leading astray and scattering those whom Christ Jesus came to gather in unity. He entrusts you to the intercession of the Holy Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church.[9]

On 30 June, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated as bishops, not three, but four SSPX priests: Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta. Bishop Emeritus Antônio de Castro Mayer of Campos, Brazil, was co-consecrator with Lefebvre.

Controversy over the consecration

The day after the consecration, 1 July 1988, the Vatican's Congregation for Bishops issued a decree signed by Cardinal Bernardin Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation, declaring that Archbishop Lefebvre had incurred automatic excommunication.[10] On the following day, 2 July, Pope John Paul II issued the apostolic letter known as Ecclesia Dei, in which he condemned the Archbishop's action.[11] The Pope stated that, since schism is defined in canon 751 of the Code of Canon Law as "withdrawal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or from communion with the members of the Church subject to him", the consecration "constitute[d] a schismatic act." He also declared: "In performing such an act, notwithstanding the formal canonical warning sent to them by the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops on 17 June last, Mons. Lefebvre and the priests Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta, have incurred the grave penalty of excommunication envisaged by ecclesiastical law", a reference to canon 1382 of the Code of Canon Law.

Lefebvre declared that he had not withdrawn his submission to the Pope, and that canons 1323 and 1324 of the Code absolved him of culpability because of the crisis in the Church.[12] Canon 1324 provides that, when someone wrongly believes that there is a state of necessity that compels him to perform a canonically illegal act (even if his ignorance on this point is culpable, provided that the act in question is not inherently evil or tending to the harm of souls), the canonical penalty for the relevant act is to be reduced or replaced, and automatic penalties do not apply. The Holy See rejects this argument as irrelevant, both because Lefebvre had been served with express canonical warnings and because of the rule in canon 1325 that ignorance which is "crass or supine or affected" provides no defence under canons 1323 and 1324. (Lefebvre's defenders have claimed that the SSPX does not plead "ignorance" but merely necessity; however, Lefebvre himself did appeal to canons 1323 and 1324.)

According to the SSPX, several churchmen and canon lawyers have affirmed that the consecration was not a schismatic act, on the basis that Lefebvre was merely consecrating auxiliary bishops rather than attempting to establish a parallel church. It has been claimed that Cardinal Castrillon Hoyos,[13] the canonist Count Neri Capponi,[14] Fr. Gerald Murray of the Catholic University of America,[15] Fr. Patrick Valdini of the Catholic Institute in Paris,[16] and Prof. Karl-Theodor Geringer and Fr. Rudolf Kaschewski of the University of Munich have taken this position. Fr. Murray and Prof. Geringer have since stated that their views have been misrepresented; it is not clear whether this is also true of the other authorities.

In line with general canonical opinion,[17] the Holy See holds that Archbishop Lefebvre committed a schismatic act,[18] but not that he created a schismatic Church. Accordingly, when Cardinal Edward Idris Cassidy presented a revised edition of the Vatican's Directory for the Application of Principles and Norms on Ecumenism, he stated that "[t]he situation of the members of [the SSPX] is an internal matter of the Catholic Church." Efforts to interpret this statement as implying that the consecration was not a schismatic act contradict canonical doctrine expressed, for instance, in circular letter 10279/2006 of 13 March 2006 from the Pontifical Council for Interpreting Legislative Texts, which states that "heresy (whether formal or material), schism and apostasy do not in themselves constitute a formal act of defection" (emphases added) from the Catholic Church. On the other hand, the Holy See takes the position that the expressions used by many adherents of the SSPX do indicate a personal "withdrawal from submission to the Supreme Pontiff or from communion with the members of the Church subject to him", which, as noted above, is the definition of schism found in canon 751.

Viewing Lefebvre's action as schismatic, a number of former members and supporters of the SSPX resigned or withdrew their support from the Society and joined the newly-founded (and Vatican-approved) Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter.[19]

Another group, the Fraternity of Saint Vincent Ferrer, founded in 1979, also broke with Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988 and immediately obtained papal recognition as a religious institute.

External links

Notes and references

  1. ↑ The Excommunication of Followers of Archbishop Lefebvre
  2. ↑ See the sermon "Bishops to Save the Church", Marcel Lefebvre, June 1987
  3. ↑ canon 1013 of the Code of Canon Law
  4. ↑ canon 1382 of the Code of Canon Law
  5. ↑ Encyclical Ad Apostolorum Principis, 41)
  6. ↑ Protocol of Agreement between the Holy See and the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X This is an English translation of the original French
  7. ↑ For public worship, care of souls and apostolic activity
  8. ↑ That is why, taking into account the strong will of the present Roman authorities to reduce Tradition to naught, to gather the world to the spirit of Vatican II and the spirit of Assisi, we have preferred to withdraw ourselves and to say that we could not continue. It was not possible. We would have evidently been under the authority of Cardinal Ratzinger, President of the Roman Commission, which would have directed us; we were putting ourselves into his hands, and consequently putting ourselves into the hands of those who wish to draw us into the spirit of the Council and the spirit of Assisi. This was simply not possible. Sermon on the occasion of the Episcopal Consecration, Marcel Lefebvre, June 1988
  9. ↑ Le Croix, 1 July 1988
  10. ↑ Decree of Excommunication
  11. ↑ Ecclesia Dei
  12. ↑ In the state of necessity the duty to provide help arises independently of the cause of that necessity The 1988 Consecrations, si si no no, SSPX Asia, September 1999 No. 34
  13. ↑ "Castrillón Hoyos: "Unfortunately Monsignor Lefebvre went ahead with the consecration and hence the situation of separation came about, even if it was not a formal schism." Rapprochement by unhasty stages, but not too slow either Interview with Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos, President of "Ecclesia Dei", on relations between Rome and the Lefebvrians, 30 Days
  14. ↑ Count Neri Capponi: "[T]his act [of episcopal consecration on June 30, 1988] was not, per se, schismatic" (Latin Mass Magazine, May/June 1993). Cited in The Illicit Episcopal Consecrations of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre by Mario Derksen at [http:\\www.DailyCatholic.org DailyCatholic.org]
  15. ↑ Fr. Murray: "[C]anonically speaking, he [Archbishop Lefebvre] [i]s not guilty of a schismatic act punishable by canon law" (Fr. Murray may have changed his view with regards to this conclusion; I do not have access to the Summer 1996 issue of the Latin Mass and am therefore unable to verify if he has or not). Cited in The Illicit Episcopal Consecrations of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre by Mario Derksen at DailyCatholic.org
  16. ↑ Fr. Valdini: "It is not the consecration of a bishop which creates the schism. What makes the schism is to give the bishop an apostolic mission" (Question de Droit ou de confiance, L'Homme Nouveau, Feb.17, 1988). Of course, Archbishop Lefebvre never gave any of his 4 bishops an apostolic mission. Cited in The Illicit Episcopal Consecrations of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre by Mario Derksen at [http:\\www.DailyCatholic.org DailyCatholic.org]
  17. ↑ Archbishop Lefebvre and Canons 1323:4° and 1324 §:5° A Canonical Study - Second Draft Edition by Peter John Vere. His lengthy study ends with: In conclusion, having exhausted the issue from a canonical perspective, despite the Lefebvrite Movement's attempts to argue canons 1323 and 1324, there can be no doubt Archbishop Lefebvre incurred the latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Holy See due his act of schism in consecrating bishops illicitly against the expressed instructions of the Roman Pontiff.
  18. ↑ L'Osservatore Romano of 30.6-1.7.1988, p. 4, published the following:
    "The following specific statement is made in relation to rumours circulating in Archbishop Lefebvre's circles concerning the latae sententiae excommunication envisaged in canon 1382:
    "In accordance with canon 1013, which states: 'No bishop is permitted to consecrate anyone as bishop, unless it is first established that a papal mandate has been issued', the episcopal consecrations that have taken place on 30 June at the hands of Archbishop Lefebvre, in spite of the admonition of 17 June, were carried out expressly against the will of the Pope by an act that, according to canon 751, was formally schismatic, seeing that Archbishop Lefebvre has openly withdrawn submission to the Supreme Pontiff and from communion with the members of the Church subject to him.
    "In consequence, both Archbishop Lefebvre and the bishops whom he consecrated, Bernard Fellay, Bernard Tissier de Mallerais, Richard Williamson and Alfonso de Galarreta, have ipso facto incurred latae sententiae excommunication reserved to the Apostolic See. Furthermore, canon 1323 cannot apply for them, since in this case none of the legal situations envisaged in that canon has been established, seeing that even the alleged "necessity" has been deliberately created by Archbishop Lefebvre for the purpose of maintaining an attitude of separation from the Catholic Church, in spite of the offers of communion and the concessions granted by the Holy Father John Paul II."
  19. ↑ The Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter was founded in July 1988 by 12 clerics who had been members or associates of the Society of St. Pius X. Why did they leave? They left when Archbishop Lefebvre decided to consecrate four bishops against the express will of the Holy Father. A Response to Christopher Ferrara Father Arnaud Devillers, Superior General, Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter – Summer 2002
Wikipedia
 This page uses content from the English Wikipedia. The original article was at Ecône Consecrations.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license.

Retrieved from "http://independentmovement.us/index.php5?title=Ec%C3%B4ne_Consecrations"
Toolbox
Personal tools